Origin of Life Fairness in Public Schools, Inc.

Intelligent people are always open to new ideas... (Proverbs 18:15 NLT)

Our Mission

Options That Achieve Goal

Scientific vs. Religious

Court Defined Religion

Frequent Questions

How to Help

The Atheist's Dilemma

Supreme Court Chutzpah

Tyranny Wears a Fig Leaf

Our Strategy

Our Activities

Court Opinions for print

For Religious Leadership

501(c)(3)s and Politics

Contact Us

 
Tyranny Naked ... and Tyranny Wears A Fig Leaf
 
 
 
 
To gain insight of "tyranny wears a fig leaf" you must first understand...
 
Tyranny Naked:
"There can be no greater stretch of arbitrary power than is required to seize children from their parents, teach them whatever the authorities decree they shall be taught, and expropriate from the parents the funds to pay for the procedure. If this principle is not really understood, let any parent holding a positive religious faith consider how it would seem to him if his child were taken by force and taught an opposite creed. Would he not recognize tyranny naked?"
 
(Isabel Paterson, "The God of the Machine", 1993 Transaction Publishers Edition, pp.255-6)
 
What are tyranny's fig leafs in America?
(1) The Government's presenting of religious theory as scientific theory.
(2) The Government's claim that parents of positive faith can put their children in private school if they wish (most can't afford it).
 
In a nutshell, the Supreme Court majority has morphed into a tyranny unseen by a slumbering electorate, mandating people of positive faith pay taxes and place their children in public schools to be taught an opposite faith. It is time to wake up that electorate.
 
Quotes from Supreme Court Justice Scalia below:
(McCreary County Ky vs. ACLU of Ky, 2005, p.25-26)
 
"What distinguishes law from the dictatorship of a shifting Supreme Court majority is the absolutely indispensable requirement that judicial opinions be grounded in consistently applied principle. That is what prevents judges from ruling now this way, now that -- thumbs up or thumbs down -- as their personal preferences dictate."
 
"Nothing stands behind the Court's assertion that governmental affirmation of the society's belief in God is unconstitutional except the Court's own say-so, citing as support only the unsubstantiated say-so of earlier Courts going back no further than the mid 20th century."
 
 
 
Top of Page

 
 
 
© Copyright 2006 Origin of Life Fairness in Public Schools, Inc.
All Rights Reserved